Next Up Previous Contents
Next: 2.3.2 What about LaTeX?
Up: 2.3 Frequently Asked Questions
Previous: 2.3 Frequently Asked Questions
[ID index][Keyword index]

2.3.1 What's wrong with HTML?

HTML was designed as a flexible and generic markup language. Unfortunately, it is a little too flexible and generic to be really useful. The power of SGML comes from its ability to represent the structure of a document faithfully, and HTML cannot do this in most cases - it has a <title> element, and some structural markup <Hn>, but apart from that, it's little better than simple ASCII text. As well, it suffers from some of the same diseases as LaTeX, as described above in Section 2.1, in that the effective definition of a `good' HTML document is `viewable by netscape', and that means that you're even less well-assured of the content and structure of a document than you are if you use LaTeX (if you are going to get involved in validating documents, you might as well go the whole hog and do it properly).


Next Up Previous Contents
Next: 2.3.2 What about LaTeX?
Up: 2.3 Frequently Asked Questions
Previous: 2.3 Frequently Asked Questions
[ID index][Keyword index]
The Starlink SGML Set
Starlink System Note 70
Norman Gray, Mark Taylor
21 April 1999. Release DR-0.7-13. Last updated 24 August 2001