Transcript of a2-tutorial ========== _0:02_: Astronomy to Relativity and Gravitation Electricals. _0:12_: Electric tutorial so-called _0:14_: and it's fairly three format. I never I've never convinced I _0:19_: have a a really good plan for what to do in this hour, but _0:26_: unimaginative. But I think going through a couple of the _0:29_: exercises in the exercise collection is probably a decent _0:33_: idea, if not necessarily terribly exciting one. _0:37_: Does anyone have any meeting suggestions for a better for _0:41_: better plans? _0:44_: Other particular areas you are particularly hoping I'll cover? _0:53_: Yeah, yeah, I'll certainly mention those. Yeah. _0:56_: In fact, let's just keep going on that. _1:01_: So as I _1:04_: mentioned in the _1:07_: I mentioned a couple of times _1:09_: and also on the on the padlet, the _1:14_: aims objectives are several pedagogical fashions out of _1:18_: date. But I find that the distinction useful. _1:22_: The distinction being that the aims are the point and the _1:25_: objectives are the accessible things. _1:29_: So you, you, you, you, you've seen this document, it's no you _1:33_: haven't seen this compendium version. But you have the the _1:37_: aims, objectives at the beginning of each chapter and _1:41_: and and I will if necessary tweak those next semester once I _1:45_: I start thinking about this a little bit more. But they have _1:50_: settled down over the last couple of years to to to what _1:54_: they are. _1:56_: The aims, as I mentioned, are the high level _1:59_: point of the course, but they tend to be expressed in terms of _2:03_: understand, appreciate, blah blah blah rather than things _2:07_: that you can actually put in an exam and so the objectives _2:12_: which roughly match. But I'm not the same thing, as the aims are _2:16_: the things that I think are fair game for the examiner. _2:21_: There's rather a long list of these. If you if you put them _2:24_: all together in one document that you do end up with quite a _2:26_: few of them. I'm not going to go through them step by step, _2:29_: but the reason that they're _2:32_: there's lots of them. It's simply because _2:35_: I I find it useful to, _2:39_: you know, concretize. What do I think is the accessible thing in _2:44_: this in this chapter? _2:46_: So, so that's why there's several of them. _2:49_: There's also quite a few of them to give me a little bit of scope _2:52_: when I'm making the exam. So these are all individually, _2:55_: there's too small to see, but you've got them in in in the, in _2:58_: the, in the notes. These are all individually quite small things. _3:03_: Very few of them are. Remember such and such. _3:06_: Basically I don't have a good memory for for, for, for, XYZI. _3:10_: Don't feel it's it's fair game to get you to memorise things, _3:14_: which I, I I wouldn't. And similarly derivations people _3:18_: sometimes people would like to put. It's an easy exam question, _3:22_: you recite the derivation of of such and such. It's not a very _3:26_: exciting exam question. It's not actually very useful thing to be _3:30_: able to do, _3:32_: so there aren't. There are a couple of things where I see you _3:35_: should be able to _3:37_: remember this blah blah. I think one of them is for example, _3:42_: to quote the expression for the scalar product between 24 _3:45_: vectors. _3:46_: I think you should have to do that because of heaven's sake. _3:50_: If you can't do that, you know that's pretty bad, but that but _3:53_: that should that should just come naturally in a sense, _3:57_: because you have used it several times in doing the exercises. So _4:00_: take those seriously. Things that are clearly not covered by _4:04_: the objectives are. _4:07_: I will regard it out of scope for the exam. _4:10_: Things which are clearly, you know covered by that I very much _4:13_: regarded in school for the exam _4:15_: Italy and it's borderline. Do feel free to ask for _4:18_: clarification, OK, but that that's the I I look at that when _4:22_: I'm when I'm making the exam. _4:26_: Any questions, _4:29_: less of them, I will. Yes. Yeah _4:34_: it's just duplicating what's in each chapter but I _4:39_: in previous years I have sometimes used slightly edited _4:41_: the list when making turn it into a a full document just _4:44_: because I I've, I've I've gone through them and thought that's _4:47_: not very clearly expressed or something. So I think yes, I _4:50_: will. I, I will put up the I can bend your version of of that and _4:54_: probably next around the time when you're starting to worry _4:57_: about you _4:59_: anything else on that particular topic. _5:03_: OK. So does that, does that answer you the question you had _5:08_: to some extent, _5:10_: Yep. _5:14_: OK _5:17_: and you were also in the lecture. That folder there is _5:21_: the list of all the exercises. _5:24_: And again this is we will, I will be going through to _5:28_: touching on this _5:32_: you the rest of the hour _5:36_: just to repeat myself again, the A2 tutorial handbook that's _5:40_: mentioned in in the Moodle includes a section on includes _5:44_: exercises for the vote, the four sub courses within a 2, the _5:48_: section of relativity. They're good exercises. They're not _5:52_: particularly keys to the way I've ended up doing these _5:55_: lectures. So when I talk about the exercises, it's these ones. _5:59_: I mean, _6:01_: OK and in _6:04_: it's a long story, but in previous years these exercises _6:06_: were included in the _6:09_: the lecture notes document chapters that you you downloaded _6:13_: and they were taken out because folks thought there were too _6:17_: many pages in those files and and and OK, but I think I _6:20_: probably should put them back in because it's a bit confusing _6:24_: having them separate. But you will find that document in the _6:28_: Election Notes folder. _6:30_: There are quite a few of them, as you will see if you examine _6:33_: it _6:34_: and _6:36_: for example. _6:42_: But you didn't have example. OK, it's slightly too small to see, _6:46_: but at the end of each of them you'll see which objectives they _6:51_: actually I I feel they _6:53_: touch on _6:55_: and some of them marked as slightly more difficult or _6:58_: slightly less difficult than than the main and some are _7:01_: marked as particularly useful. _7:03_: So this _7:06_: the minus is I I think that all all the quick questions they ask _7:10_: in the in in the lecture are D minus are particularly easy _7:14_: ones. The one at the top there is a hard one and so on. So _7:18_: that's what that notation means in case you're thinking of what _7:22_: wants to select _7:27_: and _7:30_: neither the the the the the total exercise vary quite a lot _7:35_: they from from very simple very simple things just like the _7:38_: quick questions in the lectures to things which are quite _7:41_: thoughtful and we'll we'll we'll have you puzzling over them for _7:44_: an afternoon. So there's quite a lot of variation in those. So _7:47_: those really aren't. I mean, that's a good question. Those _7:50_: are are are a poor guide to what's in the in a test or an _7:53_: exam _7:54_: because some of them are _7:58_: yeah. The the the fairly variable and and and and and. _8:01_: Next next semester I will post a a documentary includes notes on _8:06_: the on on solutions of them. _8:08_: I don't do that in the first semester because reasons, but I _8:11_: I will post an answer. This and some of some of those notes are _8:15_: like a couple of lines. Some of them are are extensive _8:18_: discussion of of of the of the point. _8:21_: So as usual the best guide to what's in the class test or _8:24_: exams or the like is previously previous papers as usual and _8:28_: those tend to have when I'm marking them. I tend to write _8:32_: notes about what people did and what people the the various _8:36_: things that odd things people and put when answering questions _8:40_: and to those those notes and fairly chatty for past papers _8:44_: for the relative reputation stuff. And those are much longer _8:48_: than would be model model answers. _8:51_: They tend to be as they chatty or anything else. So. So that's _8:56_: I'm talking too much. _9:01_: I thought of a couple of these exercises which it would be _9:05_: useful to go through _9:09_: slowly now. Can I get rid of this _9:12_: thing on the right? Probably not, _9:15_: you know, a bit bigger, _9:17_: I think. I thought of _9:20_: Access 4.7. _9:27_: OK, _9:29_: this is quite a nice exercise. Let's see if we can make that a _9:32_: bit bigger still. _9:40_: Is excess 4.7 _9:43_: caught Mcrae's? _9:45_: And this is the real thing? This isn't just a I mean, I mean that _9:48_: thing is a real bit of of observational particle physics. _9:51_: If you like _9:52_: quick raise from the top of the atmosphere, collide with it and _9:56_: it just shows of elementary particles, there's this happens. _9:60_: So, companies _10:01_: coming from the cosmos. _10:04_: Mysterious source. _10:06_: We showed them elementary particles including _10:10_: a variety of exotic particles and all ones that reached the _10:14_: ground are muons, which are sort of heavy electron, _10:17_: which are unstable and decay with a half life of of 2.2 _10:21_: microseconds. _10:27_: And they're the troubling relativistic speeds because the _10:30_: Cosby rates at the atmosphere at very high speeds at at ultra _10:34_: relativistic speeds. So the muons are moving at similarly at _10:38_: relativistic speeds. _10:40_: And the majority of the of the muons that are produced behind _10:43_: the atmosphere reach the ground _10:46_: to produce interesting. And you and you can you can test that _10:50_: you can observe that by observing the the Muon flux at _10:53_: altitude on top of the mountain and the ground level and it it _10:56_: all matches up. So, so, so this is happening. _10:60_: So supposing that these muons are created at a nominal height _11:03_: of 15 kilometres currently, how long it takes them to reach the _11:08_: ground in the earth frame giving the answer in seconds and then _11:12_: half lives. _11:13_: So this is setting up our our _11:17_: leading you through as as solving this. _11:21_: So what I will do therefore is. I think it's _11:25_: and this one which is the one which is on the E360 rather _11:29_: unfortunately would be better than the other one. Could you _11:33_: could talk on the on my left knee that adequately here. _11:38_: OK. Then _11:40_: what can do is we can talk about _11:43_: no. _11:46_: Can we see that _11:49_: you only just _11:57_: So where are we? We have, we have our _12:01_: an altitude of 15, _12:07_: there's metres _12:08_: we have. _12:13_: Uh, _12:16_: well, we want to know how long it takes to reach the ground. So _12:20_: what speed are these? Are these moving at _12:25_: anyone _12:27_: speed of light? Yes. _12:29_: So you could work out exactly how fast the moving given the _12:32_: gamma factor of or 40. But it's going to be so close to the _12:34_: speed of light it makes no difference. _12:37_: So you would just use the speed of light _12:39_: I at their speed. So. _12:44_: So there's no need for excess precision and a complicated _12:48_: calculation to try and turn gamma equals 40 into A into a _12:51_: very precise value. _13:02_: Because your teams tend to the _13:06_: 8 metres per second and I'm using physical units here rather _13:10_: than natural natural units. Because the the question is _13:14_: being framed in terms of of physical units. And the answer _13:18_: I'm looking for is in terms of seconds and half lives and so _13:22_: on. So there's no need to put any other complications there. _13:26_: They're travelling a distance of 15,015 thousand metres in at at _13:30_: a speed of of that. So the the time is equal to. _13:35_: This has been a time _13:38_: H over _13:40_: V is going to be 15, _13:46_: metres _13:47_: over the times 10 to the eight _13:52_: which is second and I'm being careful to put in the units and _13:54_: I'm looking at that and going yes, I have that, that those _13:57_: units cancel and give seconds. So I I do have that the right _14:00_: way up. _14:01_: And it's all the one of the reasons why you always put in _14:04_: units for a numerical calculation is because that _14:07_: means you can check that the units end up the right way up. _14:10_: Because that's an easy, cheap check that you haven't made _14:13_: some, you know, silly mistake and got things upside down. _14:18_: I would then 15 / 3 is 510 to 3 -. 10 to the eight is 5 * 10 to _14:25_: the minus _14:28_: 31885. It's 5 * 10 to the minus _14:35_: seconds. _14:37_: Unless anyone is going to disagree with that, _14:41_: which is _14:44_: microseconds. _14:46_: And the half life is 2.2 microseconds, so that you know I _14:52_: divide that one by the other, giving 22 point, 22.7 _14:59_: T half _15:01_: and _15:03_: so I've done. There's no relativity here, _15:07_: I've just done this is the Speed Times thing. _15:11_: I'm being reasonably careful about this. I I think if this _15:15_: were an assignment I'd I would make a stomach for a copy of _15:18_: this before submitting it, but I'm being fairly systematic _15:21_: about going about going through this. Good, so A is done and we _15:25_: haven't had to think very hard, which is always very nice. _15:30_: Calculate how long it takes the muons to reach earth in the _15:34_: muons frame, giving the answer again in. _15:39_: Seconds and half likes. _15:41_: Now why does it see in the muons stream? _15:46_: Yeah, _15:49_: Temperance transformation _15:51_: mostly right. _15:53_: You don't have to use the range transformation because it's just _15:56_: a matter of time dilation. So you can just use the time _15:59_: dilation formula. _16:01_: So, and I think that that's a a good point to emphasise, you _16:04_: don't always have to use the right transformation _16:09_: equation, and when you're doing these sort of calculations _16:12_: you'll end up using a mixture of the transformation, time _16:15_: dilation, length, contraction distance and speed times time _16:20_: in using the right the right thing at the right time. So in _16:24_: this case the question is asking that's time of 50 microseconds. _16:29_: What? So between the Muon hitting the top of the _16:33_: atmosphere and the Muon hitting the ground takes 50 microseconds _16:38_: in the Earth frame. _16:40_: What is the separation between those two events in the new on _16:43_: stream? And you could set it up with the answer that the answer _16:45_: is not wrong, _16:47_: but you'd be making it hard for yourself because then you'd have _16:49_: to think OK, what are the events, but you know and write _16:51_: things down and then go turn the handle and get the answer. You _16:54_: can just leap straight to the answer by going time relate. _16:58_: How do you work out the the time in the beyond stream? _17:07_: Why? Why over gamma? _17:16_: That that's right. And and in a sense the the slightly cheating _17:19_: answer is say because we expect it to be smaller _17:22_: because you can remember L naughty L = L naughty over gamma _17:27_: or lol or gamma times laughter, whichever. Whichever one it is. _17:32_: I I can't remember which way up it is, but I know the lengths _17:36_: contract _17:38_: that moving, moving, moving, moving length, moving rod gets _17:42_: shorter, eventually shorter, and that time dilates. _17:46_: So that in this case I expect to um _17:50_: that the answer in the burn frame to be to be less so I know _17:53_: I'm gonna I'm gonna have to divide by gamma. So that's _17:56_: that's a bit like cheating but it's it's quite legitimate _17:60_: because you are thinking through that that that you know what _18:03_: physical answer you should get which is a lot smaller and so _18:06_: you know where to multiply or divide. So I think for for this, _18:11_: for Part B _18:13_: and _18:24_: this time, _18:36_: and _18:40_: let's rate, I'm going to jump back a bit and say that's that _18:44_: That's time _18:48_: T prime equals to T over gamma equal to. _18:55_: Did prime equal to over gamma _18:58_: equals. _19:00_: With 50 _19:02_: microseconds _19:04_: over, we were told the camera was 40, _19:08_: which is equal to _19:10_: 1.25 _19:13_: microseconds. _19:14_: A question there _19:19_: and frame travelling at the speed of light. No the frame. _19:22_: The frame isn't travelling at the speed of light but we're _19:27_: this this is as I'm making a central approximation so so the _19:31_: muestrame isn't at the spiral light. When we were working _19:34_: doing the calculation, the numerical calculation that _19:37_: worked out what the the time elapsed time was we thought we _19:40_: might as well take it to be special late because the _19:43_: difference from that is going to be ignorable. If we're talking _19:46_: about two significant figures in the in in the nominal height _19:50_: then it doesn't matter. So I think that that that's being _19:53_: applying a bit of physical common sense in important _19:56_: number. Should we pick if we did it _19:58_: this exact way and went from gamma equals 40 to V equals? _20:04_: 2.9978 whatever. Then we would be injecting spurious accuracy. _20:08_: So, so, so, so, so, so yes, the mainstream isn't moving at the _20:12_: speed of light, but we can take it to be for medical purposes. _20:19_: OK. Sorry, do you? Yes, _20:23_: due to time dilation, whenever I'm writing carefully, there's _20:26_: never enough time to write carefully. But due to time _20:30_: relation, less time would pass in the nuance frame. Thus time T _20:33_: prime equals T over gamma. _20:37_: So although I said _20:41_: that we know the number of good has got to get smaller, _20:44_: therefore we divide, I don't write that down. _20:47_: What I write down is an explanation which which _20:50_: indicates that I have a clue _20:52_: that I understand what what what's happening here and you _20:57_: know, write it the right way around. OK, so I could give a _21:01_: more elaborate explanation in terms of I could, I could, I _21:05_: could write pages on that I'm sure, but I've written down _21:09_: enough to make it clear to the person marking this what _21:14_: that I understand what's happened. _21:17_: OK, because the the, the, the secret with all exams and it _21:20_: took me, I I never worked this out. When I was an _21:23_: undergraduate, I never really realised that the people marking _21:27_: my exams were the people teaching _21:30_: and the humans teaching them. And there was a human sitting _21:33_: there in the dark of the night, slogging through my, my, my exam _21:36_: papers. Because if I had, I realised that the point the way _21:40_: you do an exam is you're talking to someone, _21:43_: you're talking to him and saying look, I'm clever, _21:47_: bear that in mind. And so this due to time dilation less time _21:51_: would be would pass in the millions frame. That's saying I _21:55_: have a clue. _21:56_: OK, so bear that in mind. _21:59_: You don't have right? You don't have to write an epic, but you _22:02_: have to write something. So. So just writing down t = 2 over _22:05_: gamma T frame equal to over gamma would not get marked as _22:08_: far as I'm concerned. _22:09_: Just quoting the answer and jumping straight there wouldn't _22:12_: get marked. You have to have something in there which says I _22:15_: have a clue. _22:17_: OK. _22:19_: That by the way is my nature handwriting _22:24_: part C and we've done it in ah yeah I need a lost a mark _22:30_: I I failed to read the question and I failed to to to to write _22:35_: down that that was what the number I have is 0.57 _22:47_: 0.57 half lives. _22:50_: That was a free market nearly missed. Read the question. _22:58_: OK, so we've done I I just checked and we have done Part B. _23:01_: Now _23:02_: which part C _23:04_: can this be regarded as a test of special relativity? _23:08_: What's the answer to that? _23:16_: I mean, yes, yeah, yeah, but why? Why is it special? _23:25_: That's it. Yeah. So so the the mere fact that the, the the _23:32_: that the the naive calculation in part a is saying it takes the _23:37_: muons 22 half lives to get to earth _23:41_: means that the number of muons that you get to get to Earth _23:44_: would be 1 / 2 to the 22 _23:47_: of the number that were at the end of the atmosphere. So almost _23:50_: none. _23:52_: So the the mere fact that, as the question said, most of the _23:55_: muons arrive at Earth is telling you that the explanation that _23:59_: you would that you would naively jump to from the calculation _24:03_: part A can't be right. _24:05_: And the explanation that if there's less than one half life _24:09_: in the Muon frame, it takes less than one half life in the muons _24:14_: frame to get down to earth makes it perfectly reasonable that _24:18_: most of the muons make it to Earth. _24:21_: So the question then is how do I write that down in one sentence? _24:25_: I don't have to write a book here, I can just write down _24:28_: something like. _24:31_: How do I freeze it _24:36_: if _24:38_: the muons _24:40_: actually _24:44_: it took 22 _24:48_: half _24:49_: lives to reach _24:53_: F _24:57_: capital E _25:00_: and _25:02_: almost _25:05_: none _25:07_: would arrive _25:10_: observationally, _25:16_: most _25:19_: so _25:23_: much less _25:26_: time than _25:30_: half life _25:33_: would _25:34_: pass. _25:35_: I am just getting really messy. Sorry about that, _25:39_: Beyoncé. _25:42_: And you're not here to watch me, right? Slowly. As you. Slowly. _25:45_: Neatly. But _25:49_: right now that's not quite enough, _25:52_: because I haven't said I haven't mentioned the word special _25:54_: relativity in that sentence yet. _26:02_: How do I inject that? _26:07_: Only special relativity _26:11_: provides _26:13_: this explanation, _26:19_: right? What I've written down there is, _26:23_: but that's gone off the bottom. _26:32_: If the muons actually took 20 to half life to reach the Earth, _26:35_: almost none would arrive. Observationally, I am linking it _26:38_: to the question. _26:40_: Most do so much less time than 1/2 life must would pass in the _26:44_: muons frame. Only Sr provides this explanation and I should _26:48_: probably therefore this confirms this corroborates Sr. _26:52_: SO _26:54_: I I think if I were about to submit that as as assessment I _26:57_: would go back over that and thinking of I can reword that _27:01_: bit a bit a little bit better. But the key points are I have _27:04_: mentioned I I haven't just. I haven't stopped at the first _27:07_: sentence there. I linked it to the question I I looked at what _27:11_: I was actually asked to see _27:13_: and I I I I made some sort of link to that. I said _27:17_: observationally, most do that. That's the thing that is that is _27:21_: the key thing. _27:23_: And is this a taste of special relativity _27:26_: such sentence? Yes it is basically. I could freeze that _27:28_: better, but but, but but the, the, the, the. The point is to _27:31_: read the question and make sure you actually do answer it. _27:36_: If you haven't written a lot, I would _27:39_: tater that little bit in in wording terms to to, to to to to _27:43_: work an assessment. There's less time, of course, and exams, but _27:49_: the the, the, the goal of the scene, _27:52_: OK, _27:54_: you have it. _27:56_: No? _27:58_: In the frame of the muons, the Earth is moving towards them at _28:01_: approximately the speed of light. _28:04_: Calculate the distance between the altitude of which the under _28:07_: created and the surface of the earth in the Muon frame and thus _28:10_: how long it takes for the mules to traverse it. Give you answers _28:13_: again in seconds and half lives. So what's happening here? What _28:16_: am I asking you to do _28:19_: that students? _28:21_: That's right. _28:22_: Length contraction. Yeah, length contraction is the key thing. _28:27_: So the in the burns frame the distance from the top of the _28:31_: atmosphere to the bottom is much less than 15,000 metres. By how _28:35_: much less? By that divided by a factor of of gamma. _28:41_: So I have to indicate that I understand this. So _28:48_: in the bum stream, _28:58_: the atmosphere _29:03_: is length. _29:05_: Yeah, _29:09_: by our factor of gamma. _29:15_: Thus _29:18_: each prime equals H over _29:20_: gamma equals 15 _29:25_: those metres _29:27_: over _29:28_: 40, which is a less pretty number. What number do they cope _29:32_: with? That should be the 105 metres _29:38_: and _29:43_: in the UMM stream. _29:46_: OK _29:48_: Do I stop there? No, I do not. The question didn't ask me how _29:52_: he took asked me to do that, but it also said and thus how long _29:55_: it takes the means to traverse it. _29:59_: What speed is the Earth moving at in the beyond stream? _30:03_: Should be like, yes. So the time it takes for the Earth to travel _30:08_: 305 metres in the Muon stream. _30:11_: Yeah, _30:17_: travels with each prime _30:21_: at _30:23_: speech C in time _30:27_: T Prime equals distance is speed. _30:32_: It's each frame over C which is 3 and 75 _30:36_: metres _30:39_: times 10 to the eight metres per second _30:42_: because because that turned the number of seconds. That's good. _30:46_: I've got something done stupid to put that upside down which is _30:50_: equal to _30:53_: and that is equal to 0 point 1.25 microseconds _31:01_: which is equal to 0 point _31:04_: 57T half. And I have remembered that I'm being asked for it to _31:08_: put this in seconds and in microseconds and and in in _31:12_: seconds and in numbers of half lives, _31:18_: have I done everything? How long it takes for years, right? Yes, _31:21_: in second-half. Yes, I've done that. So I have. I've done _31:23_: answered the quest _31:25_: good. No last bit _31:31_: E _31:32_: comment on the equality or inequality of your answers to _31:37_: Part B and and D _31:40_: No comment is a keyword that there There are numerous _31:44_: keywords in exams. _31:46_: One of the very important ones is write down. If you're asked _31:50_: to write down something, it means you know this. You don't _31:53_: need any explanation. It means that it's trivial to to just put _31:57_: on paper, but you'll be asked to write down. So write down is a _32:01_: keyword. It's just I'm not expecting you to to explain _32:04_: this. You don't have to explain this _32:08_: comment is another keyword for exams. It means say something _32:11_: intelligent about. _32:14_: So what is being? _32:17_: What is it you're supposed to notice about the answers to part _32:20_: B&D? _32:24_: The equal Yeah. _32:26_: So _32:27_: the the time it takes for the Muon to get from the top of the _32:31_: atmosphere to the bottom in the Muon frame. So the amount of _32:35_: time it's got to decay _32:37_: and the amount of time it takes for the Earth to get from _32:41_: 1500 metres away to to _32:46_: to the the the thickness of the atmosphere and the muons frame _32:49_: is such that it takes only only that that time to get all the _32:53_: way through it are the same. _32:56_: If you just write down the other seam, I'll write down the seam _33:01_: and _33:09_: answer this. No, that's good. Correct tick. _33:12_: Not, not all the marks, because I haven't said what's _33:15_: interesting about that _33:18_: and and and there's a couple of things I could write down there. _33:22_: A sensible thing would be, _33:24_: um to note that _33:29_: and calculations in different frames must agree _33:34_: the they have different explanations. In one case the _33:37_: the time it the the the the the muellers clocks are being slowed _33:41_: down because of time relation. In the other case, the _33:45_: atmosphere is being compressed because of length contraction. _33:49_: Different explanations which which come to the same _33:54_: the same result. _33:57_: Uh, _33:59_: Calculations _34:02_: India. _34:04_: Different frames _34:07_: of degree. _34:11_: And I think if if I were writing an assignment, I would, you _34:15_: know, obsessed a little bit about how to frame how to freeze _34:18_: that. In writing that in an exam, I'd make sure I say _34:21_: something like that, but not. I wouldn't obsess about it. _34:25_: OK. _34:28_: You know, you can see that in the. _34:33_: In the question I said comment on the equality or inequality of _34:35_: your answers to part B&D. _34:37_: So I say hey, I I have been deliberately vague about whether _34:41_: I whether those answers should be the same. Of course they _34:45_: should be the same. But see, one way or another you _34:49_: go different answers for those two for what would be and D _34:53_: Perhaps just your arithmetics poor. OK, _34:57_: so you so you think of that. Are you think? Should I have got the _34:60_: same? Should they be the same? _35:02_: Are they interestingly different? Or have I just made a _35:05_: mistake _35:06_: and you think about that, and you might be that you conclude _35:09_: these should be the same. _35:11_: I made a mistake. _35:13_: That's fine. You write down these are different but they _35:17_: should be the same because blah blah gives us an excellent _35:20_: explanation _35:22_: because that shows me you have a clue _35:24_: and that's a general thing. In exams if things have gone all _35:27_: out of port and you you, you, you realise you've written down _35:30_: rubbish. You, you, you're the answer, you've written. Your _35:33_: writing down is is wrong. Can't be right, _35:36_: then see through. Don't just have a panic attack and score at _35:39_: the last five pages of of your exam exam question. See, this _35:43_: can't be right because _35:45_: because if you if you're if the person making it sees that _35:48_: you're thinking about this and that you you know what the _35:51_: answer should be, roughly, and that you give a a reasonable _35:54_: explanation for why it can't be right, _35:57_: then OK, you lose some marks for whatever, whatever mistake it _36:00_: was. But you'll get some marks. They'll find some marks for you. _36:04_: For you being switched on enough to know this is this is clearly _36:08_: wrong _36:09_: for this intelligent reason. _36:11_: So remember that _36:14_: again talk to your mother _36:19_: so that that's why I, you know the the order inequality is _36:23_: there just in case _36:25_: you said you retain the fact of the question but the the comment _36:31_: that you had to it can be various. _36:35_: So that's quite a a I think that was that was A _36:40_: and I think assignment one or something a few years ago. So _36:44_: that's that's a sort of Simon type question rather than exam _36:47_: type question. So. So they're not very good guide to exam _36:50_: things but I think it's a nice question to pick here because it _36:54_: covers quite a lot of things And interestingly this is from _36:57_: Chapter 4 so it's before the Lorentz transformation. So we _37:00_: haven't had to use the range transformation at all in this _37:04_: one. We just had to think about what's happening here just to _37:07_: speed times time length contraction time relation and _37:10_: and so on. _37:11_: So the more elaborate version of that we we we could ask but you _37:15_: don't have to use as I I think I said at one point that all _37:19_: relatively exam questions are the same, but just you know here _37:23_: are some numbers use the rent transformation to them from one _37:27_: frame to another. That's not actually true as you can see, _37:30_: but it's just that the range transformation is a nice _37:34_: straightforward way of _37:36_: doing this sort of calculate _37:40_: and that I meant that to take about 20 minutes, 25 minutes _37:43_: rather than _37:45_: I was chatting a lot at the begin. _37:48_: Other questions about that _37:53_: OK, _37:54_: Is that reassuring or terrifying or or, _38:00_: you know, _38:01_: are you happy? _38:06_: Actually rather 4 miles there. _38:11_: OK _38:13_: and _38:16_: OK, let's try another one. Um, _38:19_: is it the other quite nice one? _38:24_: The traditional traffic lights for example, _38:32_: so 615 _38:50_: OK, _38:51_: you're driving towards some traffic lights _38:54_: showing red _38:56_: and and no one will wavelength there. _38:58_: How fast do you have to be driving through a Doppler? _39:01_: Shifted enough that they appear to be green _39:04_: normal wavelength, _39:06_: and the question gives hints on how to how to approach this. _39:11_: OK, So what this is. This is a question about the Doppler _39:16_: shift. Obviously _39:18_: A _39:21_: SO 614. _39:31_: So here, what with with most of the of the _39:37_: questions about the Doppler shift, _39:40_: the question the the The challenge with them is always _39:44_: basically the same. _39:46_: Try not to get confused with which frame you're talking about _39:48_: and don't lose track of maintains, _39:51_: because you'll always end up having to think in which we're _39:55_: under my pointing here and it. Therefore, this is one of the _39:59_: cases where it's very important to be very clear about what is _40:03_: what moving what direction in which frame. _40:06_: So _40:09_: frame, _40:12_: yes. _40:13_: Yeah, _40:18_: Fear of Lights. _40:20_: S Prime is the _40:25_: with the car. _40:26_: OK, I'll write it down _40:29_: straightforwardly, _40:31_: and let's say we have and in this case we. I think we want a _40:35_: diagram. _40:38_: So this is, _40:40_: yes, Prime _40:42_: and we're moving towards _40:46_: some traffic lights, _40:48_: yeah. _40:51_: And here I'm _40:54_: this is, I mean Koski diagram. It's just as an ex Y diagram _40:59_: but I'm writing I'm I'm writing down that this is moving at _41:03_: speed V _41:05_: towards the right. _41:06_: OK, _41:08_: just because I'll mess up the minus signs otherwise. _41:13_: And _41:14_: in the frame of the traffic lights, _41:19_: the _41:23_: has _41:26_: if you can see F equals, we said 600 metres. _41:36_: No it doesn't. It doesn't. _41:39_: It has frequency Lambda equals 600, _41:44_: 90 metres. One year I actually _41:49_: wrote and distributed and people sat the exam in which I wrote _41:53_: and I talked about frequency of 600 nanometers and no one _41:56_: noticed. I didn't notice. The internal checkers didn't notice. _41:60_: None of the students noticed because they were. They somehow _42:03_: magically fixed it in their heads. But it was slightly _42:06_: embarrassing, but _42:09_: easier than you think to do _42:12_: anyway. So frequency, wavelength, Wavelength is _42:14_: different frequency as you learned in first year and our _42:17_: wavelength is 600 metres. _42:20_: And _42:23_: what do we have to the the, the _42:27_: in? _42:29_: It's primed _42:31_: observed at _42:34_: Lambda prime which we don't know. _42:39_: Ohh no, we do not equal 600 _42:43_: 500 nanometers. Ohh, numbers _42:50_: 500 nanometers. OK, So what do we have to play with here? What? _42:54_: What do we know about the Doppler shift? What we can do is _42:59_: we can jump back to. _43:02_: We'll scan through our notes here and and and and recall _43:06_: we have an expression _43:09_: Lake _43:11_: UH _43:15_: from Notes F primed. _43:19_: You know F _43:21_: equals F primed _43:23_: gamma _43:25_: one plus _43:27_: Cos Theta V Cos Theta. _43:36_: OK, now did that help us? _43:39_: It does because it has _43:43_: F&F prime unit which can be proxy for V and for Lambda and _43:47_: Lambda prime. We're going to think about that, _43:51_: and it has _43:52_: the speed V which is what we're trying to find out here, _43:56_: so we don't. So this is a case where we're doing the Doppler _43:59_: effect backwards, trying to find V given the change in frequency, _44:02_: and it's got this angle Theta frame. _44:05_: But what is Theta framed? A question. _44:11_: Yes. If this were an exam question I would give that I _44:14_: would give you that formula. Yeah. Because I I I wouldn't _44:17_: expect you to That's one of the. I mean I think yeah I wouldn't _44:20_: expect to memorise that partly because I don't think memorising _44:24_: is terribly useful but also because it would it would be it _44:27_: would be just so easy to get a frame with the wrong place and _44:30_: and and scupper the whole question. So I think if if we're _44:34_: an an exam question _44:36_: I would either give it in the question or since last year the _44:39_: question is the the question papers have been redesigned to. _44:42_: There's a crib at the at the beginning, so there might be a _44:45_: crib at the beginning of the of the of the paper which is just a _44:49_: list of of equations with no context, no explanation of what _44:52_: other symbols mean. Is just that that that that list there simply _44:55_: so that you you can spot which one of the is the one with all _44:58_: the primes in the right place. _45:01_: So that would be quite memory. Well, running time almost. _45:07_: But then what do you see? The frame here, _45:09_: and this is the other bit that that that all of the Doppler _45:13_: shift questions are all always getting you know our our _45:16_: testing, what direction are we talking about here _45:20_: and here the _45:25_: the, the the the directions are in the _45:28_: XY plane _45:30_: of the of the street or of the car or whatever. And the _45:33_: question is, in what direction in this plane is this light _45:37_: moving? _45:39_: OK, _45:40_: So what direction is the light moving? _45:43_: What? What? _45:45_: That's right? So Theta prime is _45:48_: new pie. _45:51_: Yes. And that's and that's and that's the thing that what all _45:54_: these doctors your questions are are are testing but can you tell _45:57_: the difference 0 and π _45:60_: and in this case the lights moving towards you so the light _46:03_: coming from the traffic light _46:06_: to the driver is moving _46:08_: in the negative X direction _46:11_: so Theta prime so so and and that's true in in both frames _46:15_: but we'll be but this requires in the in the car drivers frame _46:18_: what directions are moving in is moving in the direction opposite _46:22_: to the X prime X prime axis. So the light is moving in direction _46:25_: theatre frame. _46:27_: Yeah, _46:28_: Light moving _46:31_: at Peter Prime _46:34_: equals π, _46:37_: so _46:39_: F = F prime gamma 1 -, V _46:47_: OK, _46:48_: so the _46:52_: and _46:53_: this would be good progress here. _46:56_: We can rewrite that as F / F prime equals gamma 1 minus _47:03_: V _47:06_: and uh _47:08_: the the the the the question hints at. Right. Row equals F _47:13_: primed over F, which is also Lambda over _47:18_: Lambda prime either way up. So I'm I'm rushing slightly could _47:22_: at the end here but this I think this would not be a a terrific _47:26_: exam question because it requires you going back at you _47:29_: you're thinking a little bit more carefully and going back I _47:32_: think I've got that upside down and and so on so that there's _47:36_: there's too many hostages to fortune for like this to be a _47:39_: good exam question basically a very nice assessment question or _47:43_: excess question. So I'm going to _47:46_: skip a little bit _47:48_: and and and and and. Note that at this point we've essentially _47:51_: done all our work. _47:53_: We've got _47:55_: F / F prime, _47:56_: which we know. We know that from from the the the data given in _48:00_: the question we've got something on the right hand side which is _48:10_: depends on on V So this is one over rho squared equals 1 -, v _48:17_: ^2 / 1 -, v ^2. _48:21_: And then it's just a bit of algebra _48:24_: to turn. _48:29_: I mean you know not trivial but not really hard to to to to _48:32_: invert that and turn that from role as a function of V into V _48:36_: as a function of row. _48:38_: We rearrange it and then you could you you discover what V is _48:42_: as a function of the role which you know is a six fifths blah _48:47_: blah. Turn the handle and you get a speed which is I think _48:51_: eleven 6080 / 81 disputed later, which is very fast. _48:56_: So _48:57_: I'll stop talking in just one moment. I'll point out that yes, _49:00_: that's not a terrific exam question, but it's quite a good _49:03_: exercise and quite assignment, and that it involves first _49:07_: writing down what you know from the note and then thinking _49:10_: carefully about what the what the symbols mean and not get and _49:13_: and and watching your mind sings _49:17_: so good they have only two more lectures to go and then at the _49:21_: end of the