Transcript of gr-l11 ========== _0:09_: Hello everybody. Welcome to Lecture 11, _0:12_: which is our last lecture of GRG one _0:17_: preparing you for the likes of G2, _0:20_: so our next semester. _0:21_: So we are astonishing for _0:24_: me in very good time. _0:26_: So we've made excellent progress _0:28_: and so I think we might well. _0:31_: We'll have we're not under _0:33_: time pressure this week. _0:35_: It might even finish early. _0:38_: Where I got to last time was I was _0:42_: talking about and I hope justifying _0:44_: the idea of the the the the physical _0:48_: statement of Einstein's equations _0:50_: relating the Einstein tensor which _0:52_: is composed of the richer tensor _0:55_: and the cover change and the metric _0:58_: with and equating that for making _1:00_: that proportional to the energy _1:02_: momentum tensor which characterizes _1:05_: the distribution of energy momentum. _1:08_: In our particular volume, _1:09_: that sounds rather abstract. _1:11_: What it means is if you have a single _1:13_: mass in the in the center of the universe, _1:16_: that is a characterized by an _1:18_: appropriate Environmental Center. _1:19_: If you have an extended object _1:23_: or you have a universe full of _1:26_: certain distribution of argumentum, _1:27_: that's characterized by the energy _1:30_: momentum tensor and intuition _1:32_: tells you what the consequent. _1:35_: Distribution shape or space-time is. _1:37_: And that is. _1:40_: Basically it as far as the _1:43_: the equations it goes. _1:45_: However, _1:45_: one of the first one of _1:48_: the solutions to this was. _1:51_: Which you will learn about N G2 _1:53_: I think all you which you've also _1:55_: learned about in in in the cosmology _1:57_: lectures you've had I'm sure is the _1:59_: notion of the expanding universe. _2:00_: There's a solution to Einstein's _2:02_: equations which consists of a _2:04_: universe which is expanding, _2:05_: and this was felt. _2:07_: And at that time in the 30s, _2:10_: I think to be obviously unphysical, _2:13_: obviously unreasonable. _2:13_: That can't be, that can't be an _2:15_: answer so thought to be illegitimate. _2:18_: Solution, and that was therefore fair enough. _2:21_: That's fine. That's that. _2:22_: If physical solutions. _2:23_: So I'm saying to you that he his _2:26_: work was not done at this point _2:29_: and he added another term to this. _2:32_: And _2:35_: ah. _2:37_: Sorry, which I will write down. _2:39_: In that case which was G? _2:43_: You knew plus Lambda. Lambda G. _2:49_: You you equals Kappa T mu where Lambda is. _2:57_: Auto focus off where Lambda is just a scalar. _3:02_: Multiplying the. _3:05_: The metric and he said OK that's _3:07_: the that that's clearly what I _3:09_: should have said first time and _3:10_: and when you add that term one of _3:13_: the the the the the whole universe _3:15_: solution you can get a a static _3:18_: whole universe solution out of it. _3:21_: And it was only later, _3:22_: when the Hubble Metro expansion _3:24_: was discovered that that you know, _3:26_: and it became clear as a matter _3:28_: of observation that the universe _3:30_: was in fact expanding, _3:31_: that he referred to this _3:33_: as his greatest blunder. _3:34_: That he had wimped out effectively, _3:37_: effectively by believing experiment _3:39_: to by believing experiment too much _3:42_: and not going with the original plan _3:44_: of just sticking with the original _3:46_: version with Lambda equals 0. _3:48_: Now in a further twist, _3:50_: as you probably are aware. _3:51_: Much later on, starting in the. _3:55_: 2000s. It became. _3:58_: Clear from supernova observations that the. _4:03_: Aiming to discover whether _4:04_: whether the universe was, _4:06_: on the largest scales, _4:08_: positively negatively curved or flat, _4:10_: it became clear that that the most distant _4:13_: supernovae were retreating from us. _4:15_: Fair enough, but at an increasing rate. _4:18_: So the universe seemed to be a inflating, _4:21_: inflating, being driven by some sort _4:23_: of of of of external pressure term, _4:26_: and that was the motivation. _4:29_: In the you know the 2000s for bringing _4:32_: this version of Einstein equation back, _4:34_: gain nonzero cosmological constant a _4:37_: nonzero value of Lambda no no referred _4:40_: to as the cosmological constant _4:42_: which in has the effect was super _4:46_: children values of of Lambda of. _4:49_: Adding our. _4:50_: A negative pressure to what is effectively _4:52_: a negative pressure to the universe, _4:55_: which means the universe ends up _4:58_: expanding at a slightly accelerating rate. _5:02_: That's all very far from the future. _5:04_: The point of of saying this is to _5:07_: think what I said last time really, _5:09_: that this is, I guess, _5:11_: which is corroborated by observation. _5:13_: Einstein thought better of it. _5:16_: Then she just been again and we've _5:18_: seen change her mind again to _5:19_: bring that that that term back. _5:21_: But the point is that this is that _5:23_: these steps here of this version _5:25_: or that version of this version of _5:27_: that version are by this point not _5:29_: mathematically but physically and _5:31_: observationally and astronomically motivated. _5:35_: And, and and there's a lot more one could say _5:37_: there about where does this term come from, _5:39_: quantum gravity or something like that. _5:41_: And and you know the there are a variety _5:43_: of rabbit holes we could dive down at _5:46_: this point but we shall forbear. And. _5:51_: OK. I'll move you feel swiftly on _5:55_: unless there any questions about that. _5:59_: No. OK. So what I did the last last time _6:04_: was this all leads us to the the point _6:07_: where space and this is a formulation _6:10_: attributable to I think it's John, _6:13_: John Wheeler space tells matter how to move. _6:15_: And match your speech to curve. _6:17_: You be able to see that slogan before, _6:18_: but now you have the, _6:20_: the essentially all of the mathematical _6:22_: background to understand what's _6:24_: actually going on in that slogan, _6:26_: what that slogan is actually summarizing. _6:28_: And to some extent, at this point, _6:30_: the job of G1 is done. _6:33_: My job of G1 is to give you _6:36_: the mathematical technology. _6:38_: That will allow you to go in and _6:40_: make sense of G2G2 next term Doctor _6:43_: which is taking over this year. _6:45_: It's actually about solutions to I, _6:48_: I sense equation, it's partial solution, _6:50_: the Freedman, Robertson Walker, _6:53_: Friedman, Robertson Walker solution, _6:55_: graphical waves and so on and so on. _6:57_: And we can do that. _6:59_: So that's the that's the payoff. _7:02_: But I can't take you to the _7:03_: threshold of of that and I'm not _7:05_: give you any solutions at all. _7:07_: So we're going to look at one solution _7:10_: of Einstein's equation in outline. _7:12_: I just know. _7:15_: The pretty picture to show you _7:17_: what an orbit in our in our _7:20_: space-time is supposed to look like. _7:24_: I said that. OK. _7:27_: So you will recall that somewhere, _7:30_: I think in part one, _7:33_: I mentioned the idea of natural units, _7:34_: units in which the speed _7:36_: of light is equal to 1. _7:38_: Which essentially is deciding to. _7:42_: Use the light meter as our source, _7:45_: as as our unit of our unit of time, _7:48_: in units of which light light moves _7:51_: at one metre per light meter or one. _7:53_: It's not to mention this is merely unitless. _7:56_: People doing worrying about GR _7:58_: tend to work in a set of units in _8:02_: which seat G big is equal to 1. _8:05_: And that means that the. _8:09_: Well, we can take the squared equal _8:12_: to 0, equal to 1 or not, but the. _8:18_: The big had the value 7.2 to the _8:21_: minus 28 meters per kilogram, _8:23_: which, just like CB equal to 1, _8:25_: is a conversion between seconds and meters. _8:28_: This is a conversion between _8:30_: kilograms and meters, _8:32_: so that masses in these units _8:34_: are measured in meters. _8:35_: Which makes sense when you do, _8:37_: which seems weird, but makes sense when _8:40_: you discover the functional solution. _8:42_: Discover that the structural _8:44_: solution has in it a parameter which. _8:48_: Has the dimensions of meters, _8:49_: which is essentially the the event the size _8:51_: of the event horizon of a collapsed object. _8:54_: So jumping ahead a bit in _8:56_: the structural solution, _8:57_: there is a size parameter inside which _9:02_: the only time logistics are inwards. _9:06_: So in other words, _9:08_: even light cannot escape that there _9:10_: is no time like there's no you're not _9:13_: even a null path to greater radius. _9:15_: What is the radius? _9:16_: In other words, _9:17_: the black hole. _9:19_: So the. _9:21_: What this far should solution tells _9:22_: you is that there are such things _9:24_: as black holes which have a radius _9:26_: which is proportional to to G&M. _9:28_: In which context it makes _9:31_: sense that there is a natural? _9:33_: And correspondence between mass and the _9:37_: gravitational radius of of that mass. _9:40_: So the the mass of the sun _9:42_: for example is 3 kilometres. _9:46_: That being the side of the black _9:48_: hole into the the the the size, _9:51_: which if you compress the sun _9:53_: inside would make a black hole. _9:55_: And. _9:56_: And you you can divert yourself _9:57_: by work by working out what your _9:59_: gravity your own gravity should _10:01_: radius is and survey small number _10:03_: well it'll be 10 * 28 times whatever _10:07_: your weight in kilograms in meters. _10:10_: And as a curiosity there. _10:13_: What this also? _10:15_: A curiosity here is that even in _10:19_: classical gravitation physics, _10:21_: the thing that controls the orbit _10:27_: Newton's gravity potential is g / R. _10:34_: As you were just recall and it's GM, _10:38_: the controls the orbits, _10:40_: the behaviour of of particles in _10:42_: the source in the solar system _10:44_: and not G or M separately. _10:46_: They never appear separately. _10:47_: And what that means is that it's _10:51_: relatively easy to find what GM is and _10:53_: and and and if you're doing classical _10:56_: mechanics of the in the solar system _10:59_: what you the parameter of interest _11:01_: is GM and it's quite easy to to _11:03_: determine that from looking at the FMD. _11:05_: Of planets going around the sun _11:06_: and you can get, you can get, _11:08_: you can estimate GM to I think _11:10_: one part in 10 to the ten. _11:12_: It's extremely accurate. _11:13_: Do you to an accuracy where general _11:17_: statistic corrections matter. _11:20_: But the only way you can find what G _11:22_: is is using terrestrial experiments, _11:25_: such as you're looking at plumbs _11:26_: next to mountains and so on. _11:28_: As you will be aware, _11:29_: we can only do that to about _11:31_: one part in 10 to the five. _11:33_: And the way you find what the _11:35_: mass of the sun is is by finding _11:37_: what GM is and dividing it by G. _11:39_: Through the mass of the sun in _11:42_: kilograms is obtained by GM over G _11:44_: and has the error of G which 10 to _11:47_: minus 12:50 and 10:00 to the five. _11:49_: But the error uncertainty of the sun's _11:52_: mass in meters is essentially the _11:54_: error of of the of the gravitation power GM. _11:57_: The mass of the sun in meters _11:58_: is known to about 10 * 110 to _12:01_: 10 kilograms .10 to the five, _12:04_: so there's a nice inversion of _12:05_: what you might expect there. _12:09_: Sorry, that's all in a _12:10_: big parenthesis really. _12:13_: Moving on the. Point here is that _12:17_: we're now going to look at the. _12:20_: Solution of intense equations _12:22_: in a particular approximation, _12:24_: namely the weak field approximation, _12:25_: the approximation of. _12:29_: Small masses, so small central mass, _12:31_: something planet size or star size. _12:33_: Milk that just is isolated _12:35_: in in the in the universe. _12:37_: Or or equivalently the approximation _12:39_: where you're looking at the solution _12:41_: for a mass but you're you're quite _12:43_: far away from the mass of the masses, _12:45_: so 2nd order terms disappear. _12:48_: And then we do that and I'm going _12:50_: to go through this in in outline _12:52_: rather than in in line by line _12:53_: detail is we approximate the metric. _13:00_: By the Minkowski metric. _13:03_: Which is minus plus plus plus _13:07_: diagonal plus. A perturbation. _13:11_: And the point here that. _13:16_: This is a perturbation. _13:17_: H is small in the sense that _13:20_: the magnitude of all the values _13:22_: of H is much less than one. _13:24_: So each squad is is is ignorant. _13:28_: Now that's a matrix equation _13:30_: and not a tensor equation. _13:32_: But it turns out that. _13:35_: For reasons which we could expand on, _13:37_: but might make expander if we _13:38_: have more time at the end, _13:39_: this can be treated as if it were a tensor. _13:44_: And what we can then do is. Reexpress. _13:50_: The point I want to make here are that. _13:53_: What you're doing here is essentially _13:56_: changing into coordinates in which the. _13:60_: In which each can be regarded as _14:02_: a tensor now, and there's a couple _14:03_: of ways of thinking of that. _14:04_: One is that you are making a particular. _14:08_: Particularly our particular coordinate _14:09_: transformation which is constrained _14:11_: by the the constraint that this be _14:13_: small or you can regard this and _14:14_: this is quite quite a productive way _14:16_: of regarding of thinking about it. _14:18_: You could regard this as being as is _14:22_: it asking. About the behaviour of. _14:26_: Tensor each in a Minkowski background _14:30_: as fluctuations. Unlucky background. _14:33_: The point is that this is. _14:35_: Using that you can then calculate _14:39_: what expression is for the. _14:45_: A connection for the Riemann tensor _14:48_: in terms of H as opposed to G. _14:53_: And then express Einstein's equations, _14:57_: which are of course obtained from _14:60_: the room tense contractions in terms _15:01_: of each and and because you then _15:03_: at that at that point are dealing _15:05_: with something which is small, _15:07_: where second order terms can be neglected, _15:10_: that becomes easier to solve. _15:13_: And the solution is look at this _15:16_: just to get the terms right where _15:19_: each the as a quasi tensor is. _15:24_: Diagonal. Each nought nought _15:32_: H11H22H33. Yeah. All of these. _15:41_: Are equal to. The same. _15:47_: 5 Phi. _15:51_: I'm plugging this back into the minkovski. _15:54_: Metric using the copy metric again _15:56_: the that means that our solution. Is. _16:04_: Diagonal and minus 1 + 2 Phi. 1 -, _16:10_: 2 Phi, 1 -, 2 Phi, 1 -, 2 Phi, or. _16:17_: With an interval of. _16:23_: That's good. Plus one minus. _16:26_: Just checking up to make sure _16:29_: you get the signs right. _16:37_: Where the Sigma there is the. _16:47_: Is the the the spatial sector. _16:51_: And. _16:55_: So that that's our, _16:57_: so that's the the metric in that _16:60_: low mass weak field approximation. _17:03_: And I've. Mr Bit here which is _17:07_: fiddly rather than hard and and _17:09_: and and shoots for example goes _17:12_: does go through it step by step. _17:14_: It's not terrifically edifying but _17:16_: it's sort of reassuring that it's _17:18_: actually quite a short calculation. _17:20_: Roughly I think even they're part _17:22_: of what he says is if you then go _17:25_: through this and and and work out _17:27_: what are the components of our are _17:30_: in in details several pages of _17:32_: algebra but it's not hard algebra. _17:34_: Just turning the handle. _17:37_: Umm. _17:41_: So that's all very nice that's that looks _17:43_: like pretty and jumping ahead because we _17:46_: have time and it's quite interesting you _17:49_: will discover that when you look at the. _17:52_: We discovered this partial _17:54_: solution next semester use. _17:56_: You discover that this ends _17:58_: up being the, which is the. _18:02_: Exact solution for this same _18:04_: problem of our single central mass. _18:07_: You get an expression for the for _18:10_: the for the metric for which which _18:12_: is is equal to this to 1st order. _18:14_: So in this case we have obtained _18:17_: this by demanding that well, _18:19_: but by building on the fact _18:22_: that each is small. _18:23_: We can recover this as as the low mass _18:27_: limit of the Schwarzschild solution by. _18:31_: Depending on Phi being small _18:33_: at that hand, yes. _18:36_: I second. What these fees? _18:40_: Physical significance, good point, _18:43_: good point. This ends up being. _18:54_: Remarkably enough, what comes out of _18:56_: this is that if I just the numerically _18:60_: the same as Newton's gravitational _19:03_: potential. So using gravitational _19:05_: potential pops out of this. _19:07_: And exactly the place you'd expect. _19:10_: And or or. And it it turns out that this. _19:19_: Readius. _19:24_: It's 2. _19:28_: The the radius two GM. _19:31_: Turns out to be the that that _19:34_: that this, which is basically. _19:35_: You can see the two coming from there. _19:38_: That radius is the radius which _19:40_: I mentioned, which is the. _19:44_: Size where the structural _19:46_: solution gets interesting and _19:48_: where the black hole appears. _19:50_: So the size of a black hole is. _19:54_: Dependently it directly linked to _19:56_: this GM parameter which comes up _19:59_: which appears just as this potential _20:01_: factor in in in inside the metric. _20:09_: So that's very nice. _20:11_: But what can we do with that well? _20:13_: We've been half the thing what we we _20:16_: have worked out at this point that. _20:19_: Are are. _20:25_: A solution for instance equations. _20:27_: The next thing we have to do is workout. _20:29_: How do things move into that space-time. _20:32_: And we can do that by using _20:35_: the geodesic equation. Uh. _20:39_: Right. _20:45_: So. Point. _20:51_: So the geodesic equation _20:53_: we've seen versions of of it. _20:56_: But if you look back one of the versions _20:59_: that the sort of prime Prime primal _21:01_: version of the judges equation is, _21:04_: is that one which is the one saying _21:07_: that as as you parallel transport the _21:10_: tangent to a geodesic along the geodesic, _21:13_: it stays tangent to the geodesic. _21:15_: So that's the mathematical version _21:17_: of walking in a straight line. _21:19_: And the the part you you, you, _21:21_: you draw out by walking straight _21:23_: line is as you desire. _21:25_: That's not particularly convenient, _21:27_: but let's instead recall that the. _21:33_: We can talk about the full momentum _21:35_: of an object as just being the _21:38_: mass times the that that this. _21:40_: The the the full velocity. _21:41_: In this case, we're taking the _21:43_: full velocity to be the full _21:45_: velocity along a judic, so this. _21:53_: Judy equation turns into an expression _21:57_: involving the. Momentum of an object. _22:03_: And then the. But that's the _22:06_: geometrical version of it. _22:09_: You would recall that the _22:10_: component version of that. _22:14_: And get everything in the right place. _22:18_: And choose their indexes _22:19_: that I am consistent with. _22:24_: Who's that? It will evolve in _22:29_: the covariant derivative of the. _22:32_: Of the vector P so that's just _22:34_: the component version of this, _22:35_: which is is the A scaling _22:38_: of the duties equation. _22:39_: So asking what are the what? _22:41_: What are the are the is the the field _22:44_: of P vectors of momentum vectors which _22:49_: satisfies this equation and thus which. _22:53_: Indicate. _22:53_: The judaics in this space _22:55_: tech in the space-time. _22:60_: And that in this space dangers and _23:02_: because this covad derivative is _23:04_: picking up curve the the the way _23:06_: that the the components change as _23:08_: you move around the the space. _23:10_: So the curvature if you like is in _23:12_: the coverage of the of the space _23:15_: we're looking at here is in that. _23:17_: You could be derivative. _23:20_: And now so that's exact. _23:22_: This this far, no. _23:24_: Because we're interested in _23:25_: the weak field solution, _23:27_: we're going to take the another _23:29_: weak field approximation, _23:30_: which is to say that things _23:31_: are going to be moving slowly. _23:35_: And what that means is that for _23:38_: the momentum 4 vector of the _23:40_: geodesic we're interested in. _23:42_: The. Time component. _23:47_: It could be much larger than _23:49_: the spatial components. _23:51_: So things are going to be _23:52_: moving through time faster than _23:53_: they're moving through space. _23:54_: They are moving slowly, in other words. _23:59_: So what this? Implies is and again _24:05_: keeping things neat P alpha P mu _24:10_: comma alpha plus gamma mu. And. _24:17_: Alpha Beta P Alpha P beta. Equals zero. _24:21_: All I'm doing there is simply. _24:25_: Breaking that out in a slightly _24:27_: longer version, but if. _24:30_: The 0 component of these vectors _24:33_: are much larger than the. _24:36_: And spatial components, _24:37_: then we can then discard all the _24:40_: spatial components in that sum. _24:43_: So the only terms that _24:45_: will survive in that sum. _24:48_: Are going to be. _24:54_: The 00 times. And similarly if the _24:59_: only term that survives in this sum _25:02_: here over alpha is the zero term then. _25:06_: The. And and given that. _25:11_: The. _25:14_: P is equal to gamma M. _25:20_: When in M visa. _25:24_: No comma M1. The. The momentum for _25:33_: vector is proportional to the gamma the. _25:36_: Matter of the object being moving _25:41_: plus this one V XYZ vector here. _25:47_: The that that means that the. _25:50_: And at low speed, regardless small, _25:54_: gamma is 1, the zero the the 0 _25:58_: component is just M so it's M. _26:00_: DP mu by D Tau that survives. _26:10_: So what we're doing here is this current _26:14_: derivative in this approximation. _26:18_: I should probably see. _26:25_: OK, now what we can then do? _26:29_: It go back to the metric. _26:34_: Here. And do the things that were were, _26:38_: you know, I hope, fairly well rehearsed _26:40_: that calculating the Christoffel _26:42_: symbols corresponding to this metric. _26:46_: And we find most of them are zero. _26:49_: I just saw from the case and there's a _26:52_: hydrogen symmetry and the ones that are not. _26:55_: Are gamma 000. Which is equal to. _27:04_: 5 comma 0 plus terms of order Phi _27:08_: squared. Which number is small? _27:10_: And gamma I-00. Which is. _27:20_: Comma, G. _27:25_: Both genes evolving fine before. _27:32_: OK. And what if we then look at _27:36_: this component by component, _27:38_: we find that therefore M. _27:45_: DP naughty by detour. Yeah, _27:49_: I can't, right? Plus gamma. _27:52_: Comma 005 comma 0. P nought squared. _27:60_: Which is just. MDP nought by D Tour plus. _28:12_: I'm expecting to see our. _28:16_: The term here. No, it's good. _28:22_: Ohh yes plus m ^2. Have. Yeah, squared. _28:30_: Phi comma not equals 0 or. _28:36_: DP nought by D Tau is equal _28:40_: to minus MD Phi by DT. Toll. _28:46_: And what that is saying is that. _28:49_: The. Reach the the the. _28:53_: Change in the energy. _28:55_: Of this particle. _28:57_: Is proportional to the change in time. _29:01_: Of the potential, _29:02_: and we given that there isn't more _29:06_: mass certainly appearing here, _29:08_: that's going to be 0. _29:09_: In other words, _29:10_: that's saying the energy is _29:12_: conserved as the particle _29:13_: moves along the geodesic. _29:15_: Through phoned one of the relevant. _29:21_: Descriptions of the motion. _29:28_: Now looking at the special one. _29:30_: Uh. And looking at. This one here. _29:37_: What we then discovered _29:39_: there is that DPI by D. _29:42_: Tall. Is equal to minus M. _29:48_: If I. Comma I which is the I _29:53_: spatial derivative of the. _29:59_: Of this potential, which is _30:01_: just a funny way of writing. _30:04_: The Richard change of momentum. _30:06_: The force. Is equal to minus. Gradifi. _30:14_: Which you will recognize as the equations _30:18_: of motion in Newton's gravitational theory. _30:22_: That the the particle moves in such _30:24_: a way that the rate of change of its _30:28_: momentum is directed along the gradient _30:30_: of the gravitational potential. _30:35_: Which is very gratifying _30:37_: because this means that that _30:39_: the low energy approximation, _30:41_: that low energy approximation _30:43_: of of of Einstein's theory _30:45_: recovers the manifest successful. _30:51_: Theory of gravity that Newton _30:53_: developed for from starting from _30:55_: a completely different place. _31:00_: So. _31:04_: I think I I've I've missed _31:06_: these quick questions. _31:10_: Those are in, in, in, in, in the notes. _31:13_: So I think that's that's basically budget _31:16_: and and I think that's a a remarkable thing. _31:19_: I I do know what know what I may appear _31:21_: to the world but to myself I seem to be _31:23_: more like a a boy a boy playing on the _31:25_: seashore and diverting myself now and now _31:27_: and then finding a smoother Pebble or a _31:30_: prettier shell than ordinary with great _31:32_: ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before _31:34_: me there's a certain rejection to that. _31:37_: I think on Newton's part he _31:39_: knew that he had done great. _31:40_: Things and found beautiful, _31:43_: mathematically beautiful _31:44_: explanations of what happened. _31:45_: But there was much more to find. _31:47_: It took 300 years to find _31:49_: something that was better. _31:50_: But as we've discovered, _31:52_: what he did is contained _31:54_: within a later theory. _31:59_: And that is essentially it. _32:03_: I we were ahead of time. _32:04_: I've slightly spun out by talking about _32:07_: spatial solution and G2 and and and so on, _32:09_: but I think it's actually a first that _32:13_: I've managed to get to the end without _32:17_: galloping through the last lecture _32:19_: in a something of a mild panic but. _32:22_: That we've got here, _32:23_: we've got technology, _32:24_: you've got one solution and you have _32:26_: the browser uplands of G2 to find all _32:29_: sorts of other solutions next semester. _32:31_: And so we we might as well stop _32:34_: there or we'll get questions. _32:40_: Questions. But we can do. _32:43_: If we want to run off, that's fine. _32:45_: If if one turns into an impromptu _32:48_: supervision question session, _32:49_: question session or chat session, _32:51_: then that's fine too. _32:54_: How about it? Question over there. _33:02_: Can you say where's tricked _33:04_: ourselves to the motion by N _33:05_: relativistic particle we have this, _33:07_: where does this come from like. _33:10_: So uhm. The question there is um. _33:17_: This approximation. _33:18_: Why that drove that approximation? _33:21_: Is basically comes from. _33:24_: From this. So you may recall, _33:28_: you may not recall that when you _33:31_: talk when a special activity, _33:33_: you talk about the relativistic. _33:38_: Velocity. _33:39_: It's it's a form momentum _33:41_: which includes the the. _33:43_: Let's not talk to the _33:45_: momentum rather than velocity. _33:47_: The full momentum involves the spatial _33:50_: momentum and the time component _33:52_: of the four momentum which is the _33:55_: energy of the particle and you _33:57_: discover that the low speed limit _33:59_: of that what that in in in the _34:01_: frame in which the word is that. _34:05_: Does that look sort of familiar? _34:07_: Have you seen something like that? _34:09_: Before or vaguely enough that you _34:11_: believe me that that's the key, right? _34:13_: So that's that's the key and and _34:16_: the low speed in the frame of _34:17_: which the particle is not moving, _34:19_: you discover, _34:20_: good heavens, _34:20_: that the the 0 component has is _34:23_: gamma M which doesn't go to zero as. _34:29_: As the speed goes to 0, _34:31_: the the 0 component energy is gamma M _34:33_: or in physical units gamma Mt squared? _34:36_: Or will be SU equals MC squared. _34:38_: That's where equals MC squared comes from. _34:40_: But in this case. The. _34:47_: This time component is always gamma _34:49_: M but in the case where you're _34:52_: looking at particles which are moving _34:55_: only slowly and by slowly meaning. _34:58_: Much less than the speed of light. _34:60_: Then. Each of these spatial components _35:05_: VVZ will be much less than one, _35:07_: much less than C. _35:09_: And so these people, _35:11_: and that will be therefore true of the. _35:15_: Overall momentum component, _35:16_: so the spatial components. _35:18_: Will be small more than the energy _35:20_: components simply because the energy _35:21_: component is primarily the particles mass. _35:23_: So in the case where essentially _35:25_: all of the particles energy is in _35:28_: the form of its mass as opposed to _35:30_: its mass and its kinetic energy. _35:32_: Then we can solve this in in that _35:37_: limit to get Newton's theory. _35:39_: So that's telling us that Newton's _35:42_: theory goes wrong. _35:43_: When things move at rustic speeds, _35:46_: which is terribly surprising. _35:48_: And what that means is things go _35:50_: wrong when things were rustic speeds, _35:52_: a because they're moving rapidly _35:54_: and B because there is a component, _35:56_: there's an element of of energy. In the. _36:01_: Simply by virtue of the particles motion. _36:05_: Which, which is which will grab, _36:07_: which gravitates. _36:09_: So the the the the. _36:13_: The energy that's in our particles motion. _36:17_: The instruments in particle motion, _36:18_: it was Einstein's theory. _36:21_: It's Andrew Mentum, the gravity. _36:22_: It's not mass. _36:24_: And that is a thing which does not. _36:28_: It was something moves faster _36:30_: than it gravitates more. _36:32_: And that's that's completely _36:34_: alien to Newton's theory. _36:35_: I just you cannot be there and your theory. _36:37_: That's why in a sense this this _36:40_: has to be the the limit in which _36:43_: Newton's theory will pop out, _36:45_: the case where we're _36:47_: ignoring the gravitation, _36:48_: the gravitating influence of kinetic energy. _36:51_: That's the physical interpretation of. _36:57_: So this is the. As I mentioned, _37:02_: this links to this partial _37:03_: solution in the sense that. _37:08_: There. This metric here is derivable _37:13_: as the as the little file limit _37:16_: of the partial solution. The. _37:21_: As far as your solution is the exact _37:23_: solution to an approximate problem. _37:26_: In the sense that it is the _37:28_: solution to the approximation where _37:29_: the universe has one mass in it. _37:32_: And that's not actually true there. _37:33_: There's more than one star in the universe. _37:35_: But in certainly in our environment there _37:39_: it is a very, very good approximation. _37:42_: And it's the solution that is used _37:45_: for essentially all of the relativity _37:47_: corrections to things that GPS, _37:49_: to things like precise timing, _37:51_: to things like the deflection of radio _37:54_: waves by going near the start that, _37:57_: that, that the, the, the, _37:59_: the sun and the Eddington Dyson. _38:02_: Observations of the deflections of the. _38:06_: Ohh of um. _38:09_: Dilate as it comes past the sun in Eclipse, _38:12_: which you've heard of. _38:13_: Yes, eddington. _38:16_: And perhaps I didn't mention that _38:17_: and well I didn't mention though, _38:19_: but I thought yeah it might be _38:21_: that that that that sort of _38:23_: normally comes later than the, _38:24_: the what I'm seeing but earlier _38:28_: than G2 because amongst the the _38:31_: the effects of this of this. _38:34_: Solution to. _38:37_: GR Well, _38:37_: if you remember back in in _38:40_: lecture one beginning in part, _38:42_: one of the things we discovered _38:44_: was the coolest principle tells _38:46_: you that that that light must _38:47_: bend in the gravitational field, _38:49_: that the wholeness of things falling down, _38:51_: down lift shafts. _38:52_: But we didn't calculate how _38:55_: much that that deflection was. _38:57_: Now you can calculate it. _38:59_: Based on the. Gravitational. _39:06_: Red shift of our particle. _39:09_: So one of the other things we _39:11_: mentioned in part one was the _39:13_: idea that as our photon. _39:15_: Claims through graphical field it's _39:17_: frequency changes and to the extent _39:19_: the frequency is are a proxy for a clock, _39:23_: a photon oscillation is proxy for _39:26_: clock that is telling us that time _39:30_: moved differently at different _39:32_: at different gravitational _39:34_: potentials and from that. _39:36_: You can deduce. _39:40_: Through a few a few steps, _39:42_: but not too many, _39:43_: that there will be a particular _39:44_: deflection of Starlight as it _39:46_: comes a past a gravitating body. _39:48_: You can work out what the _39:49_: selection will be purely from that. _39:52_: And you can also use this solution _39:56_: this approximate solution. _39:58_: The this week full solution _39:60_: of Einstein's equations. _40:01_: To work out what the deflection what what, _40:04_: what, what the geodesic or _40:06_: photon is as it goes near a mass, _40:09_: whatever near counts as and _40:11_: you discover it's deflected. _40:12_: Of course you know very way _40:14_: better that it didn't happen, _40:15_: so there's a deflection of _40:17_: light as it goes near mass. _40:19_: And you can calculate what the _40:20_: angle of that deflection is. _40:22_: You discover is twice the angle _40:24_: that you got when you use only _40:27_: the gravitational redshift. _40:30_: Which and. And so Einstein and Eddington. _40:34_: Got to the first answer first. _40:37_: I think Einstein got the I think _40:39_: it would be representing 13 or _40:41_: something that he worked out how _40:42_: much the deflection would be based _40:44_: purely on on on the gravitational _40:46_: redshift and that was the prediction _40:48_: for how much that affection would be _40:51_: and it was only after in about 19. _40:55_: 16 or 17 I think when the when this _40:57_: solution was was available to work _40:60_: out what the deflection would be _41:02_: based on the field equations and so _41:05_: there's going to be a reflection. _41:07_: The OR the prediction and how _41:08_: do you find that deflection? _41:10_: You what you look at star at _41:12_: stars as the as the lake from the _41:15_: moves near a battered body. _41:17_: There could be massive _41:18_: body in the neighborhood. _41:19_: Yes, there is the sun. _41:20_: Unfortunately you can't see the stars in _41:22_: the daylight because the sun's very bright. _41:24_: So you wait for an eclipse. _41:27_: And conveniently, _41:28_: there was a total solar eclipse visible from _41:31_: some parts of the of the planet in 1919, _41:34_: so just after the First World War. _41:38_: And. _41:40_: You know, I could go on the _41:43_: story for quite a long time. _41:45_: With all sorts of layers of of interest, _41:48_: but the short version, _41:49_: the focusing on the on the physics version. _41:52_: Is that it was a fairly prediction _41:55_: at this point of GR that there _41:57_: would be deflection. _41:59_: And through the next edition _42:00_: mounted by Edison, _42:02_: who is the head of the _42:04_: Cambridge Observatory and. _42:08_: Herbert Dyson. Some Frank Frank Dyson, _42:12_: who was the director of the grand jury, _42:15_: and they put together the equipment you've _42:17_: scattered because of the First World War, _42:19_: but the equipment to make an _42:21_: expedition to Brazil and the. _42:27_: I don't want to keep Verde islands anyway, _42:29_: somewhere in the southern Atlantic where _42:32_: where there was it was going to seasonality _42:35_: and long observational story later the the, _42:37_: the, the three three possible outcomes of _42:39_: that of the observation were no deflection, _42:41_: which is what in the sense that the the _42:44_: the intoning, they would see the what _42:46_: was called the Newtonian deflection, _42:48_: which was the the one that that _42:50_: Einstein and Co had produced based on _42:52_: purely graphical redshift and the full _42:55_: Einsteinian deflection which was the. _42:57_: And they obtained from this, _42:59_: which is twice the Newtonian 1. And the. _43:02_: Observational but opposition nightmare things _43:05_: which were supposed to work didn't work. _43:08_: There was rain though, you know, _43:11_: in the field, literally covered in _43:13_: mud in the 10 minutes of totality. _43:17_: But they did manage to exclude the the, _43:21_: the, the reflection case and. _43:24_: Arguably and correctly exclude _43:26_: the Newtonian version, _43:27_: and thus confirmed by direct observation _43:30_: that the deflection was what Einstein, _43:32_: Einstein Field equation set, _43:34_: and Einstein became a worldwide _43:36_: celebrity and so on. _43:37_: And there's also a footnote to _43:39_: that story which are fascinating, _43:40_: which I might put something and pass _43:43_: on to you because it's interesting. _43:46_: Before we start off with this, _43:47_: ohh yes, _43:48_: but the the point is that that's _43:50_: an approximate solution, _43:53_: but the smart solution is the exact _43:55_: solution to the same problem which. _43:58_: Can be approximated and the _43:59_: smart solution because the metric _44:01_: would be approximated by this. _44:07_: So that was a very long answer _44:08_: to a question which I've slightly _44:10_: lost track of, but I other more. _44:19_: You have a box? _44:20_: Yeah, we know that photo. _44:21_: That will be the gravitational well, _44:23_: yeah. Four, yes, so, so. _44:29_: Right, so the question is why do _44:31_: why are photons deflected by this? _44:33_: And the answer to that is. _44:38_: That this is the. What we have here is the. _44:45_: Well. That's the equation which solving. _44:49_: Uh, what? Asking what is the? _44:56_: Geodesic traced out by a Momentum 4 vector. _44:59_: Now we motivated here by by describing the _45:03_: momentum of a massive massive particle, but. _45:09_: I don't think we covered that here. _45:12_: You can also talk about _45:12_: the momentum of a photon. _45:13_: Even classically you could talk _45:15_: about the momentum of photon. _45:16_: How much I as all the momentum _45:18_: of an electric field. _45:20_: As an electric field interacts _45:22_: with with matter, it will transmit. _45:25_: Momentum to it, in some cases through _45:28_: the Lorentz force law and so on. _45:32_: And that you so you can talk about _45:35_: the momentum of our classical field _45:36_: and if you think of of the quantum _45:39_: mechanics you know you will know _45:41_: that the photons have have have 4 _45:44_: vectors they they have, they have, _45:46_: they have energy and momentum and _45:49_: So what we're solving here is the. _45:53_: Judic. Of the momentum 4 vector. _45:58_: Something irrespective of what _45:59_: the momentum 4 vector of. _46:01_: So for a massive particle it'll be the _46:04_: mass times the four four velocity of that. _46:09_: Of that object for a photon that the _46:11_: the previous didn't really mean much _46:12_: in the matter 0 so we have a different _46:15_: definition of what the full mentum is. _46:17_: But it's still that we're, _46:19_: we're we're solving however in. _46:23_: In this expression for the. _46:27_: The potential Phi. _46:28_: The mass here is the mass _46:30_: of the central object. _46:32_: That's the mass of your star or _46:34_: your planet or or or whatever _46:37_: you're talking about. _46:37_: So does that sound evasive or _46:39_: is that the does that cover? _46:48_: Because of the. _46:51_: And this this mindset here. _46:56_: Of the final final. Well, _47:02_: I think that's that comes just because. _47:08_: This is our a rewrite of. _47:15_: MPIBYD. Tall plus. _47:34_: And I think the whoops, _47:38_: we're just rearranging that equation. _47:40_: That's the geodesic, that's the _47:42_: space part of the geodesic equation. _47:44_: And so just rearranging that it's where the. _47:48_: It's where that when you're saying. Appears. _47:57_: It had, but it worked. A question there. _48:03_: Lucky. _48:07_: Because we go back to. _48:10_: Yeah. And. Each. Here in detention, _48:16_: because there's no reason why it should be. _48:21_: All we've done here is, is, is. _48:24_: Write down the. Component of the metric _48:29_: in a particular frame. Being the. _48:33_: Components of the of the Minkowski metric _48:37_: plus A+ some other other components. _48:40_: So this is just a matrix equation. _48:45_: So there's nothing. _48:47_: We're right in that and not care and not _48:49_: make any constraints of what each is. _48:51_: Each could be as big as because we're like. _48:54_: We are, however, choosing. _48:55_: The the point of doing this is that we _48:59_: want to see these are perturbations, _49:02_: so we want to say these are are small. _49:07_: But that's not attention thing to say. _49:09_: You can't really talk about attention _49:11_: in that context, attention being small. _49:14_: So we couldn't write G equals ETA _49:19_: plus H and say each is small. _49:23_: Because that doesn't really mean that _49:25_: that that's not a sensory thing to say. _49:28_: If you're like, _49:30_: there's a better way of expressing that, _49:32_: but we. _49:33_: Are saying we're making this constraint, _49:35_: this constraint as a matrix constraint. _49:37_: So it's true, it's this approximation is _49:41_: meaningful only in a particular frame. _49:44_: So yeah so that's basically this _49:46_: is a frame dependent approximation. _49:49_: It's only in one frame in basically _49:52_: the local inertial frame that we _49:54_: that that this we can talk about _49:56_: these components being small. _49:58_: And it's then involves a bit of _50:01_: stepping back and I think about it to _50:04_: discover that when you turn the handle, _50:06_: you can review this as a tensor _50:09_: on a on a on a flat background. _50:13_: So I think that, that, that, _50:14_: that, _50:15_: that the basic AHA is that that _50:17_: approximation, _50:17_: that those those pair of things _50:19_: is meaningful only in one in in, _50:20_: in in a small set of coordinate choices. _50:25_: Namely, _50:25_: those which are which are almost minkowsky. _50:31_: And and and the there's a dangerous _50:33_: bend as a section there which I think _50:36_: was added after veteran requestion _50:38_: what one of the year which talks of _50:40_: which goes into more detail about _50:42_: that which talks about what how what _50:45_: you're doing here is either talking _50:48_: about tensor on a flat background or _50:50_: you're talking about age choice here. _50:53_: And if you've done a quantum field _50:55_: theory as some of you will have _50:57_: done you and certainly if you've _50:60_: done classical electromagnetic. _51:01_: 80 and the notion of the wrench gauge. _51:04_: You will discover that there is a _51:06_: the notion of gauge fixing being _51:08_: engaged choice essentially the _51:09_: the exotic mathematical version _51:11_: of choosing the right coordinates. _51:13_: If you choose the right coordinates _51:14_: then you can do all your calories _51:16_: in a particular gauge. _51:17_: Where things make are simple and _51:19_: this essentially therefore engage _51:21_: choice in those terms. _51:24_: And that is time up, I think. _51:27_: So I have the usual, usual second _51:32_: officer tomorrow and I think we _51:35_: have a supervision a week on Friday. _51:37_: So I meet you some of you